English lacks a neuter third-person pronoun, so when we're not sure of someone's gender we use "they". For example: "Someone just called and hung up on me -- they've got alot of nerve" and "If we hired someone to take your place, they'd have some big shoes to fill." We do this because we fear repercussions; not using a gender-neutral noun is a felony in some states, so we fear the long arm of the law when it comes to pronouns.
Unfortunately, many people use "they" even when the gender of the person referred to is known. For example, "I won't tell you who James is dating, but I will tell you they took him to the Pocono's last weekend" or "Guess who won Best Male Vocalist? I'll give you a clue: you have all of their albums".
In the first example sentence, it's okay to use a gender-specific pronoun. In this case, we'll assume that the speaker and the listener both know James's dating preferences pertaining to gender (and, since I'm basing the example character loosely on myself, we'll say that he'd prefer to date women to men at this stage in his life). It's okay to say that James is dating a "she".
For the second example, it's also okay to use a gender-specific pronoun. We can safely presume that the winner in a category titles Best Male Vocalist would be a male. And it's Vocalist, not group, so it would be one individual whose albums you would have. And I've seen your album collection, and I wouldn't be bragging about it if I were you.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The views expressed in this blog are not necessarily those of Blogger or Google. They don't often represent views held by friends and family of the author, his church or workplace, his wife or even himself.
A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by little statesmen and philosophers and divines. With consistency a great soul has simply nothing to do. He may as well concern himself with his shadow on the wall. Speak what you think now in hard words, and to-morrow speak what to-morrow thinks in hard words again, though it contradict every thing you said to-day. — 'Ah, so you shall be sure to be misunderstood.' — Is it so bad, then, to be misunderstood? Pythagoras was misunderstood, and Socrates, and Jesus, and Luther, and Copernicus, and Galileo, and Newton, and every pure and wise spirit that ever took flesh. To be great is to be misunderstood. --Ralph Waldo Emerson, "Self-Reliance"
2 comments:
Good point. I will keep that in mind when I grade papers and when I write my own.
By the way, I guess I'm still in a "grading papers" mode, but I noticed "example" was mispelled. :)
ahem fixed mispelling ;-)
thanks
Post a Comment